Chilton County – Website Accessibility Audit Report






Chilton County – Website Accessibility Audit Report


Chilton County Seal

Website Accessibility Audit Report

chiltoncounty.org | Audit Date: April 10, 2026 | Standard: WCAG 2.1

Tool: Accessibility Checker (WordPress)
Standard: WCAG 2.1 A / AA
Total Open Issues: 1,970
Status: Remediation Required

Executive Summary

This report presents the results of an automated accessibility audit conducted on the Chilton County, Alabama official website (chiltoncounty.org) using the Accessibility Checker plugin. The audit evaluated conformance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, Levels A and AA. A total of 1,970 open issues were identified across 22 distinct issue types. Immediate remediation of Critical and High severity issues is strongly recommended to achieve legal compliance and ensure equal access for all residents.

23Critical Issues
626High Issues
1,166Medium Issues
96Low Issues
! Critical Issues — Immediate Action Required

Critical issues are serious accessibility barriers that block access or functionality for users with disabilities. These represent direct WCAG Level A violations and carry the highest legal risk for ADA non-compliance.

Issue TypeTypeWCAGCountDescription
Empty LinkProblemA8Links that contain no text or accessible name. Screen readers announce these as “link” with no destination context, making navigation impossible for blind users. Often caused by icon-only links (e.g., social media icons) with no aria-label.
Linked Image – Empty Alt TextProblemA8Images inside links that have empty or missing alt attributes. When an image is the only content of a link, its alt text must describe the link destination. Without it, screen reader users hear nothing meaningful.
A Video is PresentNeeds ReviewA3Videos detected on the site require review to verify captions, audio descriptions, and transcripts are present. Pre-recorded video must have captions and audio descriptions to be accessible to deaf and blind users.
Ambiguous Anchor TextProblemA2Links with non-descriptive text like “click here,” “read more,” or “learn more.” Screen reader users often navigate by listing all links on a page — vague text makes it impossible to understand link purpose out of context.
A Slider is PresentNeeds ReviewA2Carousels/sliders require review to confirm they can be paused, stopped, or controlled by keyboard. Auto-playing content that cannot be paused can be unusable for users with cognitive disabilities or those using screen readers.
High Severity Issues – Significant Barriers

High severity issues create substantial usability problems for assistive technology users. They do not completely block access but make using the site significantly difficult and should be addressed promptly.

Issue TypeTypeWCAGCountDescription
Improper Use of LinkProblemA351The single largest issue on the site. Links are being used for actions that should use buttons, or links are present with no valid href. Semantic correctness is critical for keyboard and screen reader navigation.
Possible HeadingNeeds ReviewA112Text that appears visually styled as a heading (large, bold) but is not marked up as an HTML heading element (H1-H6). Screen reader users rely on heading structure to navigate pages; missing headings forces linear reading of all content.
Insufficient Color ContrastProblemAA86Text and background color combinations that do not meet the WCAG AA minimum contrast ratios. Affects users with low vision, color blindness, or those in poor lighting conditions.
Tab Order ModifiedNeeds ReviewA24Custom tabindex values are modifying the natural tab order. Illogical keyboard navigation order disorients keyboard-only users and screen reader users who rely on a predictable DOM order.
Incorrect Heading OrderProblemA21Heading levels are being skipped (e.g., going from H2 directly to H4) or used out of logical order. This breaks the document outline that screen reader users rely on to navigate sections efficiently.
Image – Empty Alternative TextNeeds ReviewA20Images with alt=”” that may not be purely decorative. Images conveying information or context must have descriptive alt text. These need human review to determine whether they are informational or decorative.
Link to PDFNeeds ReviewA6Links to PDF files that may not be accessible. PDFs must be tagged, have reading order, and proper document structure to work with screen readers. Government PDFs are a common accessibility liability.
iframe Missing TitleProblemA3Embedded iframes (maps, videos, forms) without a descriptive title attribute. Screen reader users cannot identify the purpose of an iframe without a title and may not know whether to enter or skip it.
Missing TranscriptProblemA3Audio or video content that lacks a text transcript. Transcripts are required for audio-only content and strongly recommended for video, ensuring access for deaf users and those who cannot play media.
Medium Severity Issues – Usability Concerns

Medium issues cause frustration or confusion and may have workarounds, but should be addressed as part of a comprehensive remediation plan to improve overall user experience.

Issue TypeTypeWCAGCountDescription
ARIA HiddenNeeds ReviewA947The largest volume issue on the site. Elements marked aria-hidden=”true” need review to ensure meaningful content is not being hidden from assistive technologies. Hiding meaningful content creates barriers for screen reader users.
Duplicate Alternative TextNeeds ReviewA214Multiple images with identical alt text, which may indicate alt text is being reused without describing each image uniquely. If images convey different content, each needs a unique, descriptive alt text.
Low-quality Alternative TextNeeds ReviewA4Alt text that is present but unhelpful such as file names or non-descriptive phrases. Alt text must convey the meaning and purpose of the image to be useful.
Empty Heading TagProblemA1An H1-H6 tag with no text content. Empty headings confuse screen readers, which may announce “heading level 2” with no text following, disorienting the user and breaking the page navigational structure.
Low Severity Issues – Best Practice Improvements

Low severity issues may affect some users or cause annoyance but typically do not prevent access. Addressing these demonstrates a commitment to best-in-class accessibility.

Issue TypeTypeWCAGCountDescription
Underlined TextNeeds ReviewA70Non-link text that is underlined may be mistaken for hyperlinks, causing confusion for users with cognitive disabilities. Underlines should be reserved for links.
Empty Paragraph TagNeeds ReviewBest Practice25Empty paragraph tags used for visual spacing. Screen readers may announce these as blank, creating unnecessary noise. Spacing should be handled with CSS rather than empty HTML elements.
Image Long Alternative TextNeeds ReviewA1An image with alt text that exceeds recommended length. Long alt text is harder for screen reader users to absorb. Complex images should use a visible caption instead.
Passed Checks – No Issues Found

The following checks returned zero issues. These represent areas where the site is performing well and must be maintained during future content updates and development work.

Check NameSeverityWCAG
Empty ButtonCriticalA
Image Map Missing Alternative TextCriticalA
Image Missing Alternative TextCriticalA
Linked Image Missing Alternative TextCriticalA
Zooming and Scaling DisabledCriticalAA
Missing Form LabelCriticalA
Missing Table HeaderCriticalA
Blinking or Scrolling ContentCriticalA
Broken ARIA ReferenceHighA
Broken Skip or Anchor LinkHighA
Empty Table HeaderHighA
Image Animated GIFHighA
Link to MS Office FileHighA
Long Description InvalidHighA
Missing Language DeclarationHighA
Missing TitleHighA
Duplicate Form LabelMediumA
Link Opens New Window or TabMediumA
Link to Non-HTML FileMediumA
Missing SubheadingsMediumA
Text Too SmallMediumAA
Text JustifiedLowAAA

Recommended Next Steps

Phase 1 – Immediate: Address all 23 Critical issues. Focus on Empty Links, Linked Image Alt Text, and Ambiguous Anchor Text first as these are clean code fixes.

Phase 2 – Short-Term: Remediate High severity issues, beginning with Improper Use of Link (351 instances) and Insufficient Color Contrast (86 instances). These have the greatest volume impact.

Phase 3 – Ongoing: Work through Medium and Low issues. Implement an accessibility review process for all new content to prevent regression.